Bridget Daugherty - During my time in the Okemos School district I have had many opportunities to see literacy talks take place, with reading and writing being one of the districts main focuses. The most common type of talks that I see in my first grade classroom are response centered talks. The first grade class is fortunate enough to have the opportunity to work in small reading groups (about seven students) with the help of MSU seniors (myself and Katie G.) and parent volunteers. In these small groups students make predictions about the story they are going to read. Next each student takes a turn reading. When they are done the group begins the discussion by talking about their favorite parts of the book. During this time it is clear that the students are making connections between what they read, what they see in the illustrations and sometimes they make inferences. Next we read the reader’s response question which is an inference question that follows the story. The students have to use their gap filling and problem solving skills to answer the question. I allow the students to openly talk about the question. This is often times difficult however because I feel like students are talking out of turn or getting off subject and I intervene more then I probably should. (I need to work on this!) The students typically come to a common response to the question however this is not always the case. When students do disagree however the conversation is often more in depth because they are more eager to get their response across to their classmates. After working with the students for almost four months doing this style of talking I was never actually ware that it was called “Response Centered Talking.”
Working in small groups away from the rest of the class is a great opportunity for both the students and the teacher. It allows the students the chance to have more input then what they may in a larger group setting. It also provides the teacher a chance to develop an understanding of how the students are critical thinking about the stories they are reading. The approach of having students think critical about the text is a great way to learn. The style of talk that focuses on understanding the plot, characters, theme and ect. is beneficial, however response centered talks allow the students to on what lies beyond the text itself. Response centered talks are truly the window on children thinking.
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Bridget, I had a text to self connection while reading your response. I did not know these types of conversations were called "response-centered talks" either. I never knew the correct term until reading this article.
Letting a conversation happen is a hard skill to learn, and surely all of us could work on it. But, perhaps more importantly, what can you teach your students about conversational turn taking and how to effectively respond? What would they have to know and be able to do for you to feel like they could handle the conversation with less intervention?
Letting a conversation happen is a hard skill to learn, and surely all of us could work on it. But, perhaps more importantly, what can you teach your students about conversational turn taking and how to effectively respond? What would they have to know and be able to do for you to feel like they could handle the conversation with less intervention?
Bridget- I have also seen many response-centered talks in my classroom but they are whole-class talks about the novel "Bud, Not Buddy." I actively listen to these talks but have never held one on my own. I look forward to our upcoming assignment in this class so I have the opportunity to have my own response-centered talk with a group of students.
Bridget, I think it is wonderful that the class uses parent volunteers on a regular basis. I think anytime you can get parental involvement in the class you have the potential to create a positive and productive classroom environment. Parental involvement is especially nice in literacy development, as who is a better supporter of a child’s reading than a parent.
Post a Comment